EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 111 / Numéro 3 (2023) Matériaux & Techniques, 111 3 (2023) 301 Références
Numéro
Matériaux & Techniques
Volume 111, Numéro 3, 2023
Special Issue on ‘Transitions for materials and society’, edited by Jean-Pierre Birat, Andrea Declich, Ayoung Jo and Gaël Fick
Numéro d'article 301
Nombre de pages 10
Section Materials and SSH, materials and society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mattech/2023015
Publié en ligne 14 juin 2023
  1. B. Latour, On recalling ANT, The Editorial Board of The Sociological Review, 1999 [Google Scholar]
  2. J.P. Birat, Materials are social constructs, but they also have agency, in: Presented to the Leiv Kolbeinsen Symposium, NTNU, Trondheim, 2 November 2022, Matériaux & Techniques (2023) doi:10.1051/mattech/2023012 [Google Scholar]
  3. J.-P. Birat, A. Declich, S. Belboom, et al., Society and Materials: A series of regular seminars based on a dialogue between soft and hard sciences, Metall. Res. Technol. 112, 501 (2015), doi:10.1051/metal/2015024 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. J.P. Birat, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and related methodologies, part of chapter 43: Methods to evaluate environmental aspects of materials, in: Seshadri S. (ed.), Treatise on process metallurgy, vol. 3, Elsevier, 2013, 25 p. [Google Scholar]
  5. J.P. Birat, MFA vs. LCA, as environmental management methods in industry, Matériaux & Techniques 108, 502 (2020) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Serres, La traduction, Éditions de MINUIT, Collection : Hermès, 1974 [Google Scholar]
  7. O. Jolliet, M. Margni, R. Charles, et al., IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology, Int. J. LCA 8, 324–330 (2003), doi:10.1007/BF02978505 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Hernandez-Padilla, M. Margni, A. Noyola, et al., Assessing wastewater treatment in Latin America and the Caribbean: Enhancing life cycle assessment interpretation by regionalization and impact assessment sensibility, J. Clean. Prod., (2016), doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.068 [Google Scholar]
  9. Prospective LCA, Paul Scherrer Institute, https://www.psi.ch/fr/ta/prospective-lca [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Pizzol, R. Sacchi, S. Köhler, et al., Non-linearity in the life cycle assessment of scalable and emerging technologies, Front. Sustain. 1, 16 (2021), art. no. 611593, doi:10.3389/frsus.2020.611593 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. D.R. Cooper, T.J. Gutowski, Prospective environmental analysis of emerging technologies, J. Ind. Ecol., (2018), doi:10.1111/jiec.12748 [Google Scholar]
  12. S.D.I.A. Amarasinghe, H. Chandanie, Essential stakeholder contributions for establishing life cycle assessment (LCA) in the construction industry: A desk study, in: Sandanayake Y.G., Gunatilake S., Waidyasekara A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th World Construction Symposium, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 8–10 November 2019, pp. 320–329 [Google Scholar]
  13. M.J. Goedkoop, R. Heijungs, M.A.J. Huijbregts, et al., ReCiPE 2008: A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, Publication by Ministerie van VROM, Den Haag, Netherlands, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  14. All the publications by CIRAIG in Montreal, which was instrumental in developing the IMPACT WORLD + methodology are available from https://www.impactworldplus.org/en/publications.php [Google Scholar]
  15. BIO-LCA (Bio-LCA: Introducing biodiversity in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)) – Final Report Summary, FP7 EU Project, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Geyer, D.M. Stoms, J.P. Lindner, et al., Coupling GIS and LCA for biodiversity assessments of land use, Part 1: Inventory modeling, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15, 454–467 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Geyer, D.M. Stoms, J.P. Lindner, et al., Coupling GIS and LCA for biodiversity assessments of land use, Part 2: Impact assessment, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15, 692–703 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J.-P. Birat, Life Cycle Assessment and related methodologies, Chapter 3: Environmental aspects, in: Treatise on process metallurgy, 2nd ed., 2023 [Google Scholar]
  19. L. d’Andrea, A. Declich, Materials, technology and society: Contributions from a sociological perspective, Matériaux & Techniques 102(5), 507 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  20. T.J. Pinch, W.E. Bijker, The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other, Soc. Stud. Sci. 14, 399 (1984) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A European Green Deal, Available from https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en [Google Scholar]
  22. J.-B. Bayart, C. Bulle, L. Deschênes, et al., A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15, 439–453 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. L. Mancini, F. Ardente, M. Goralczyk, et al., Life Cycle Assessment and criticality of raw materials: Relationship and potential synergies, in: Conference Proceedings: Perspectives on Managing Life Cycles, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Life Cycle Management, Gothenburg (Sweden), Chalmers University of Technology, The Swedish Life Cycle Center, 2013, pp. 520–523, JRC80606, https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC80606 [Google Scholar]
  24. ILCD Handbook: Analyzing of existing Environmental Impact Assessment methodologies for use in Life Cycle Assessment, 1st ed., JRC, European Union, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  25. Revealed: More than 90% of rainforest carbon offsets by biggest provider are worthless, analysis shows, The age of extinction, Carbon offsetting, The Guardian, (2023), https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/18/revealed-forest-carbon-offsets-biggest-provider-worthless-verra-aoe [Google Scholar]
  26. T. Fischer, H. Knuth, G. Getarnt, die Zeit, (2023), Available from https://www.zeit.de/2023/04/co2-zertifikate-betrug-emissionshandel-klimaschutz [Google Scholar]
  27. The Carbon Con, The world’s biggest companies, from Netflix to Ben & Jerry’s, are pouring billions into an offsetting industry whose climate claims appear increasingly at odds with reality, Source Mater., (2023) [Google Scholar]
  28. P. Brey, Philosophy of technology meets social constructivism, in: Social constructivism for philosophers of technology: A shopper’s guide, Society for Philosophy and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 3-4, 1997 [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.