Matériaux & Techniques
Volume 107, Number 5, 2019
Materials and Society: The Circular Economy (SAM13)
Article Number 504
Number of page(s) 14
Published online 20 January 2020
  1. J.-C. Moisdon, A. Hatchuel, Du mode d’existence des outils de gestion, Actes du séminaire Contradictions et Dynamique des Organisations-CONDOR-IX, 6, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  2. È. Chiapello, P. Gilbert, Sociologie des outils de gestion, 3, Éditions La Découverte, Paris, France, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  3. European Commission, Regulation (EC) No. 443/ 2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Official Journal of the European Union, Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  4. R.B. Howarth, Status effects and environmental externalities, Ecol. Econ. 16(1), 25 (1996), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. ScoreLCA, Life Cycle Costing : description méthodologique et mise en oeuvre (no Étude no 2016-03), Score LCA, Villeurbanne, France, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Anya Phelan, L. Dawes, R. Costanza, I. Kubiszewski, Evaluation of social externalities in regional communities affected by coal seam gas projects: A case study from Southeast Queensland, Ecol. Econ. 131, 300 (2017), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Steen, Calculation of monetary values of environmental impacts from emissions and resource use, The case of using the EPS 2015d Impact Assessment Method, J. Sustain. Dev. 9(6), 15 (2016), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L. d’Andrea, A. Declich, F. Feudo, Hidden societal implications of materials, Updating the awareness on what is at stake, Matériaux & Techniques 102(5), 504 (2014), [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. J.S. Thomas, A. Carvallo, J.P. Birat, Metrics for the sustainability value of steel, Matériaux & Techniques 102(5), 505 (2014), [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. M.B. Holbrook, Consumer Value: A framework for analysis and research, Routledge, United Kingdom, 1999 [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Koffler, K. Rohde-Brandenburger, On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15(1), 128 (2010), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Volvo, KPMG, True Value case study, Volvo Group, KPMG, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2015, accessed at [Google Scholar]
  13. Solvay, Sustainable Porfolio Management guide: Driving long-term sustainable growth, Solvay, Brussels, Belgium, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  14. International Energy Agency, Energy technology perspectives, in: Deploying renewables: Principles for effective policies, International Energy Agency, OECD, Paris, 2008, pp. 15–198, [Google Scholar]
  15. J.M. Allwood, J.M. Cullen, Sustainable materials: With both eyes open, UIT Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  16. J.M. Allwood, M.F. Ashby, T.G. Gutowski, E. Worrell, Material efficiency: A white paper, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55(3), 362 (2011), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M.F. Ashby, Materials and the Environment, 2nd Edition, Elsevier, 2012, accessed at [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Lindahl, K.-H. Robèrt, H. Ny, G. Broman, Strategic sustainability considerations in materials management, J. Clean. Prod. 64, 98 (2014), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Zervas, Analysis of the CO2 emissions and of the other characteristics of the European market of new passenger cars, 1. Analysis of general data and analysis per country, Energy Policy 38(10), 5413 (2010), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. ICCT, European vehicle market statistics 2018/2019, 64, International Council on Clean Transport, Washington, USA, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Cooper, B.J. Doody, J.M. Allwood, Socio-technical factors influencing current trends in material throughput in the UK automotive industry, J. Clean. Prod. 156, 817 (2017), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. F.W. Geels, A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies, J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 471 (2012), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. David, Outils de gestion et dynamique du changement, « Les organisations face au changement », Rev. Fr. Gest. 120, 44 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  24. H. Dumez, Comprehensive research: A methodological and epistemological introduction to qualitative research, Copenhagen Business School Press, Frederiksberg, Danemark, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Ayache, H. Dumez, Le codage dans la recherche qualitative une nouvelle perspective ? Le Libellio d’AEGIS 7(2-Été), 33 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  26. C. Sánchez‐Rodríguez, D. Hemsworth, Á.R. Martínez‐Lorente, J.G. Clavel, An empirical study on the impact of standardization of materials and purchasing procedures on purchasing and business performance, Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 11(1), 56 (2006), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Russo, D. Morrone, D. Calace, The green side of the automotive industry: A consumer-based analysis, J. Market. Dev. Compet. 9(2), 59 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  28. D.-C. Dabija, B.M. Bejan, V. Dinu, How sustainability oriented is generation Z in retail? A Literature Review, Transform. Bus. Econ. 18(2), 140 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  29. L. Patouillard, P. Collet, P. Lesage, P. Tirado Seco, C. Bulle, M. Margni, Prioritizing regionalization efforts in life cycle assessment through global sensitivity analysis: A sector meta-analysis based on ecoinvent v3, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 24, 2238 (2019), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, ILCD handbook: General guide for life cycle assessment: detailed guidance, European Commission Joint Research Center, Brussels, Belgium, 2010, Accessed at [Google Scholar]
  31. C. Gobin, Réussir une construction en éco-conception, Presses des Mines, Paris, France, 2010, accessed on 11th July 2019 at website: [Google Scholar]
  32. C. Industriteknik, C. Teknikpark, Choice of system boundaries in life cycle assessment, J. Clean. Prod. 2(1), 21 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. B.P. Weidema, Short procedural guideline to identify the functional unit for a product environmental footprint and to delimit the scope of product categories, 2.-0 LCA consultants, Aalborg, Danemark, 2017, p. 20 [Google Scholar]
  34. N.P. Suh, Axiomatic design theory for systems, Res. Eng. Des. 10(4), 189 (1998), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. A.-M. Tillman, Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 20(1), 113 (2000), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. H. Coutant, Les Synthèses de La Fabrique, « Qu’est-ce qu’une "boîte d’ingénieurs" ? », La Fabrique de l’industrie, Paris, France, 19, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  37. N. Iken, F. Aggeri, S. Morel, How to conduct a sustainability transition at the company level? The role of impact valuation tools and management instruments, R&D Management Conference, Présenté à École Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France, 2019, accessed at [Google Scholar]
  38. F. Aggeri, La recherche-intervention : Fondements et pratiques, in: J. Barthélémy, N. Mottis (Eds.), À la pointe du management. Ce que la recherche apporte au manager, Dunod, 2016, pp. 79–100 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.