EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 105 / No 5-6 (2017) Matériaux & Techniques, 105 5-6 (2017) 504 References
Issue
Matériaux & Techniques
Volume 105, Number 5-6, 2017
Society and Materials (SAM11)
Article Number 504
Number of page(s) 7
Section Environnement - recyclage / Environment - recycling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mattech/2018010
Published online 30 May 2018
  1. A. Osterwalder, Y. Pigneur, Clarifying business models: Origins, Present, and future of the concept, Communications of AIS, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Chesbrough, R. Rosenbloom, The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox corporation’s technology spin-off companies, industrial and corporate change, Oxford university press, 2002, pp. 529–555 [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Freeman, A. Wicks, B. Parmar, Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”, Organ. Sci. 15(3), 364 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Bocken, S. Short, P. Rana, S. Evans, A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes, J. Clean. Prod. (2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Tukker, Product services for a resource-efficiency and circular economy − A review, J. Clean. Prod. 97, 76 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Meier, R. Roy, G. Seliger, Industrial product-service Systems-IPS2, CIRP Annals-Manuf. Tech. 59, 607 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Bourg, N. Buclet, L’économie de fonctionnalité. Changer la consommation dans le sens du développement durable, Revue futurible 313, (2005) [Google Scholar]
  8. C. (du) Tertre, Économie de la fonctionnalité, Développement Durable et innovations institutionnelles, in: E. Heurgon (Ed.), Économie des services pour un Développement Durable l’Harmattan, Paris, 2007, pp. 142–255 [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Buclet, L’économie de fonctionnalité entre éco-conception et territoire : une typologie, Développement durable et territoires, 5(1), 2014 [En ligne] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Tukker, Eight types of product-service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet, Bus. Strategy Environ. 13(4), 246 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Allais, J. Gobert, A multidisciplinary method for sustainability assessment of PSS: challenge and developments, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Tech. 15, 56 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Gobert, R. Allais, Cadre d’analyse interdisciplinaire des projets d’économie circulaire : représentations des territoires d’action et mobilisation des capitaux, conference ASRDLF2016, Gatineau, QC, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Gobert, R. Allais, Intellectual and territorial capital for the sustainability assessment of a servitization project, 9th European Conference on Intellectual Capital, ECIC2017 conference, Lisbon, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  14. N.F. Nissen, H. Griese, A. Middendorf, J. Müller, H. Pötter, H. Reichl, Comparison of simplified environmental assessments versus full life cycle assessment (LCA) for the electronics designer, life cycle networks, in: Proceedings of the 4th CIRP International Seminar on Life Cycle Engineering, CIRP, Berlin, Germany, 1997, pp. 435–444 [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Valkama, M. Keskinen, Comparison of simplified LCA variations for three LCA Cases of electronic products from the ecodesign point of view, in: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, ISEE’08, 2008, pp. 1–6 [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Horne, T. Grant, K. Verghese, Life cycle assessment: principles, practice and prospects, CSIRO Pub.9780643094529, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  17. ILCD. 2010, General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment − Detailed guidance European Commission − Joint Research Centre − Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Office of the European Union [Google Scholar]
  18. H.K. Chan, X. Wang, A. Raffoni, An integrated approach for green design: life-cycle, fuzzy AHP and environmental management accounting, Br. Account. Rev. 46, 344 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J.G. Vogtländer, A. Bijma, H. Brezet, Communicating the eco-efficiency of product and services by means of the eco-costs/value model, J. Clean. Prod. 10, 57 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. F. Zhang, M. Rio, R. Allais, P. Zwolinski, T. Reyes, L. Roucoules, E. Mercier-Laurent, N. Buclet, Toward a systemic navigation framework to integrate sustainable development into company, J. Clean. Prod. 54, 199 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. O. Pialot, D. Millet, Why upgradability should be considered for rationalizing materials? 21st CIRP conference for life cycle engineering, Procedia CIRO 15, 379 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Perry, S. Richet, 2013, Pré-projet de recherche collaboratif, bilan et évolutions des filières de recyclage des produits et matériaux dans les secteurs automobile, navale et aéronautique, ecoSD [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Allais, T. Reyes, L. Roucoules, Inclusion of territorial resources in the product development process, J. Clean. Prod. 94, 187 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Allais, L. Roucoules, T. Reyes, Governance maturity grid: a transition method for integrating sustainability into companies? J. Clean. Prod. 140, 213 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Gobert, R. Allais, Under review, L’économie de la fonctionnalité et le défi de créer une proximité organisationnelle aux niveaux opérationnel et stratégique, RERU [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.