Matériaux & Techniques
Volume 105, Number 5-6, 2017
Society and Materials (SAM11)
Article Number 513
Number of page(s) 11
Published online 11 July 2018
  1. L. d’Andrea, A. Declich, F. Feudo, Hidden societal implications of materials. Updating the awareness on what is at stake, Matériaux & Techniques 102(5), 504 (2014) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. L. d’Andrea, A. Declich, Materials, technology and society: contributions from a sociological perspective, Matériaux & Techniques 102(5), 507 (2014) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Von Schomberg, A vision of responsible innovation, in: R. Owen, M. Heintz, J. Bessant (Eds.), Responsible innovation, John Wiley, London, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Caiati, A. Declich, The social nature of materials. A brief overview and two case studies concerning the Energy transition context, Matériaux & Techniques 104(6–7), 603 (2016) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes, J.P. Trevor, eds, The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology, 1987 [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Rugani, E. Benetto, E. Igos, G. Quinti, A. Declich, F. Feudo, Towards prospective life cycle sustainability analysis: exploring complementarities between social and environmental life cycle assessments for the case of Luxembourg’s energy system, Matériaux & Techniques 102(6–7), 605 (2014) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. J.-P. Birat, Materials, beyond Life Cycle Thinking, Rev. Metall.–Int. J. Metall. 109(5), 273 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Wajcman, Feminist theories of technology, Cambridge J. Econ. 34(1), 143 (2010), DOI: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M.A. Miodownik, Stuff matters: exploring the marvelous materials that shape our man-made world Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, New York, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Waked, Nano materials applications for conservation of cultural heritage, in: Proceedings of the Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture XII, ChiancianoTerme, Italy, 5–7 September 2011 (accessed on 4 of May 2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Bratteteig. Bringing gender issues to technology design, in: Feminist challenges in the information age, VS VerlagfürSozialwissenschaften, 2002, pp. 91–105, Available from (accessed on 17/06/2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Wajcman, Reflections on gender and technology studies: in what state is the art?, Soc. Stud. Sci. 30(3), 447 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C.S. Fischer, " Touch someone": the telephone industry discovers sociability, Technol. Cult. 29(1), 32 (1988) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. W.E. Bijker, Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: toward a theory of sociotechnical change, MIT press, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Ingold, Materials against materiality, Archaeol. Dialogues 14(1), 1 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Ingold, Bringing things to life: creative entanglements in a world of materials, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, Manchester, NCRM Working Paper Series 05/10, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Kuchler, Materials and sociality, in: N.J. Long, H.L. Moore (Eds.), Sociality, New Directions, Berghann, New York, Oxford, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Barry, Material politics: disputes along the pipeline, John Wiley & Sons, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  19. J.P. Birat, Society and Materials: how it all started, a few million years ago, Matériaux & Techniques 104(6–7), 605 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  20. European Commission (2011), High level EXPERT GROUP ON Key Enabling Technologies, Final Report June, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  21. I. Rafols, P. van Zwanenberg, M. Morgan, P. Nightingale, A. Smith, Missing links in nanomaterials governance: bringing industrial dynamics and downstream policies into view, SEWPS SPRU Electronic Working Papers Series Paper No. 180, February 2010 [Google Scholar]
  22. E. Karana, O. Pedgley, V. Rognoli, On materials experience, Des. Issues 31(3), 16 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Wilkes, S. Wongsriruksa, P. Howes, R. Gamester, H. Witchel, M. Conreen, M. Miodownik, Design tools for interdisciplinary translation of material experiences, Mater. Des. 90, 1228 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. European Commission, She Figures 2015, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  25. D.N. Beede, T.A. Julian, D. Langdon, G. McKittrick, B. Khan, M.E. Doms. Women in STEM: a gender gap to innovation(2011) (accessed on 6/05/2017 on [Google Scholar]
  26. M.A. Miodownik, Toward designing new senso-aesthetic materials, Pure Appl. Chem. 79(10), 1635 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. C.R. Østergaard, B. Timmermans, K. Kristinsson, Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation, Res. Policy 40(3), 500 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. M.A. Miodownik, Interview on Ingenia on Line Issue 61, December, 2014 (accessed on 13/05/2017 [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Murray, K. Skene, K. Haynes, The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context, J. Bus. Ethics 1–12, 369 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  30. EEA (European Environment Agency), Circular Economy in Europe – Developing the Knowledge Base, 2016 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.