Matériaux & Techniques
Volume 107, Number 1, 2019
Society and Materials (SAM12)
Article Number 105
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 21 March 2019
  1. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Towards the circular economy 1: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Cowes, Isle of Wight, UK, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Schandl, et al., Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: Scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions, J. Clean. Prod. 132, 45 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. International Monetary Fund (IMF), Index charts, 2000–2017, Available from [accessed September 2018] [Google Scholar]
  4. British Geological Survey, Risk list 2015 [online], 2015, Available from [accessed September 2018] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Towards the circular economy 2: Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Cowes, Isle of Wight, UK, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  6. W.R. Stahel, Circular economy, Nature 531, 436 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Nakajima, et al., Thermodynamic analysis for the controllability of elements in the recycling process of metals, Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 4929 (2011) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Ohno, et al., Unintentional flow of alloying elements in steel during recycling of end-of-life vehicles, J. Ind. Ecol. 18(2), 242 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Nakamura, et al., MaTrace: Tracing the fate of materials over time and across products in open-loop recycling, Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 7207 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Takeyama, et al., Dynamic material flow analysis of nickel and chromium associated with steel materials by using Matrace, Materiaux & Techniques 104, 610 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. European Aluminium Association (EAA), Aluminium recycling, in: LCA, Version: September 2013, European Aluminium Association (EAA), Brussels, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Gaudreault, Methods for open-loop recycling allocation in life cycle assessment and carbon footprint studies of paper products, Technical Bulletin No. 1003, National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc (NCASI), Research Triangle Park, N.C., 2012 [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Geyer, et al., Common misconceptions about recycling, J. Ind. Ecol. 20(5), 1010 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Koffler, et al., Tackling the downcycling issue–A revised approach to value-corrected substitution in life cycle assessment of aluminum (VCS 2.0), Sustainability 2013(5), 4546 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M.A. Reuter, et al., Limits of the circular economy: Fairphone modular design pushing the limits, Metallurgy – ERZMETALL 71, 2 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Andersson, et al., Are scarce metals in cars functionally recycled?, Waste Manag. 60, 407 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Nakamura, et al., Quantifying recycling and losses of Cr and Ni in steel throughout multiple life cycles using MaTrace-Alloy, Environ. Sci Technol. 51, 9469 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Government of Japan, The advanced utilization of the end-of-life vehicle originated scraps: as the technical report of MOE funded project “Advanced metal recycling technology development”, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Government of Japan, 2005 Input-Output Tables for Japan (in Japanese). Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, Available from [accessed September 2018], 2009 [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Oda, et al., Substance flow and stock of chromium associated with cyclic use of steel in Japan, ISIJ Int. 50(2), 314 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. I. Daigo, et al., Substance flow analysis of chromium and nickel in material flow of stainless steel in Japan, Resour. Conserv Recycl. 54, 851 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) Government of Japan, Survey of the circulation of metal resources from end-of-life vehicles in Japan FY2014 (in Japanese), 2015, pp. 41–52 [Google Scholar]
  23. B.K. Reck, et al., Anthropogenic nickel cycle: Insights into use, trade, and recycling, Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 3394 (2008) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. K. Nakajima, et al., Simultaneous material flow analysis of nickel, chromium, and molybdenum used in alloy steel by means of input-output analysis, Environ. Sci Technol 47, 4653 (2013) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Nakajima, et al., Development of multi-value circulation based on remanufacturing, 12th International Conference on Society & Materials, SAM12, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  26. United States International Trade Commission (USITC), Overview of U.S. Remanufacturing Activities, in: Remanufactured goods: An overview of the U.S. and global industries, markets, and trade, investigation No. 332–525, USITC Publication 4356, 2012, pp. 2–3 [Google Scholar]
  27. European Remanufacturing Network (ERN), Remanufacturing market study, Oakdene Hollins Ltd., Aylesbury, UK, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  28. Yano Research Institute Ltd., Automotive Aftermarket 2017, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  29. European Union, Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  30. P. Lacy, et al., Waste to wealth: The circular economy advantage, Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  31. U. Tischner, et al., Sustainable electronic product design, in: V. Goodship, A. Stevels (Eds.), Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) handbook, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 2012, pp. 405–441 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. E. Maris, et al., From recycling to eco-design, in: E. Worrell, M.A. Reuter (Eds.), Handbook of recycling, Elsevier, Waltham, USA, 2014, pp. 421–427 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.