EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 107 / No 5 (2019) Matériaux & Techniques, 107 5 (2019) 507 References
Issue
Matériaux & Techniques
Volume 107, Number 5, 2019
Materials and Society: The Circular Economy (SAM13)
Article Number 507
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mattech/2019030
Published online 26 February 2020
  1. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (BMU), Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2018, Berlin, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  2. P.S. Morrison, B. Beer, Consumption and environmental awareness: Demographics of the European experience, in: H. Shibusawa et al. (Eds.), Socioeconomic environmental policies and evaluations in regional science, New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives 24, Springer, Singapore, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  3. Deutsches Institut für Normung, DIN EN ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework, Beuth Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  4. Deutsches Institut für Normung, DIN EN ISO 14044: Environmental management – life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines, Beuth Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  5. European Commission – Joint Research Centre – Institute for Environment and Sustainability: International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD), Handbook – General guide for Life Cycle Assessment – Detailed guidance, 1st ed., EUR 24708 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  6. C.R. Boër, P. Pedrazzoli, A. Bettoni, M. Sorlini, “ Mass customization and sustainability”, Springer, London, 2013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Betten, R. Bouslama, D. Wehner, V. Uusitalo, Unlocking sustainability potentials in product development through extended knowledge and predictions about the product use phase, in: H. Binz et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung SSP 2019, Stuttgart, Germany, 2019, pp. 223–232 [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Matuštík, V. Kočí, Environmental impact of personal consumption from life cycle perspective – A Czech Republic case study, Sci. Total Environ. 646, 177–186 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A.P. Arena, R. Piastrellini, G.N. Barón, B.M. Civit, YUPI®, A regional footprint calculator, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22, 546–556 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. G.A. Blengini, T. Di Carlo, Energy-saving policies and low-energy residential buildings. An LCA case study to support decision makers in Piedmont (Italy), Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15(7), 652–665 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Schlegl, J. Gantner, R. Traunspurger, S. Albrecht, P. Leistner, LCA of buildings in Germany: Proposal for a future benchmark based on existing databases, Energy Build. 19, 342–350 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Held, R. Graf, D. Wehner, S. Eckert, M. Faltenbacher, S. Weidner, O. Braune, Abschlussbericht: Bewertung der Praxistauglichkeit und Umweltwirkungen von Elektrofahrzeugen, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  13. H.C. Kim, T.J. Wallington, Life Cycle Assessment of vehicle lightweighting: A physics based model to estimate use phase fuel consumption of electrified vehicles, Environ. Sci. Technol. 50(20), 11226–11233 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A.-K. Briem, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mass Customization and Personalization – Community of Europe (MCP-CE 2018), Novi Sad, Serbia, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Saner, H. Heeren, B. Jäggi, R.A. Waraich, S. Hellweg, Housing and mobility demands of individual households and their life cycle assessment, Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 5988–5997 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Walzberg, T. Dandres, N. Merveille, M. Cheriet, R. Samsona, Assessing behavioural change with agent-based life cycle assessment: Application to smart homes, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 111, 365–376 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Pourabdollahian, F. Steiner, O.H. Rasmussen, S. Hankammer, A contribution toward a research agenda: Identifying impact factors of mass customization on environmental sustainability, Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. (IJIEM) 5(4), 169–178 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Fornasiero, C. Brondi, D. Collatina, Proposing an integrated LCA-SCM model to evaluate the sustainability of customisation strategies, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 30(7), 768–781 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. F.P. Revellio, Closing loops in the Circular Economy: A make or buy analysis for the smartphone industry, Master’s Thesis, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Zwiers, S. Behrendt, E. Göll, Fairphone: Fallstudie im Rahmen des Projekts Evolution2Green – Transformationspfade zu einer Green Economy, Adelphi, Borderstep, IZT, Berlin, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Hankammer, N. Wang, J. Guo, Consumption trends in China and Germany: An empirical cross-cultural study on the role of sustainability and customizability, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mass Customization and Personalization in Central Europe, Novi Sad, Serbia, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Bai, X. Zhu, X. Wang, N. Ren, Identify stakeholders’ understandings of life cycle assessment results on wastewater related issues, Sci. Total Environ. 622-623, 869–874 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. N. Itsubo, K. Murakami, K. Kuriyama, K. Yoshida, K. Tokimatsu, A. Inaba, Development of weighting factors for G20 countries – Explore the difference in environmental awareness between developed and emerging countries, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 23, 2311–2326 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. O. Bakås, B. Sjøbakk, L. Skjelstad, M. Thomassen, Integrating sustainability knowledge in choice navigation, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mass Customization and Personalization – Community of Europe (MCP-CE 2018), Novi Sad, Serbia, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Anagnostopoulou, E. Bothos, B. Magoutas, J. Schrammel, G. Mentzas, Persuasive interventions for sustainable travel choices leveraging users’ personality and mobility type, in: J. Ham et al. (Eds.), Persuasive technology, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference PERSUASIVE 2018, Waterloo, ON, Canada, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  26. University of Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg supports new centre of excellence for “Mass Personalization” at the Stuttgart location. Joint initiative by the University of Stuttgart and the Fraunhofer Institute for personalized products, Press release No. 092, 18.07.2017, Available from https://www.uni-stuttgart.de/en/university/news/press-release/Neues-Leistungszentrum-Mass-Personalization-am-Standort-Stuttgart/ (Accessed: 28/05/2019) [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Held, D. Wehner, R. Hämmerl, M. Dangelmaier, A.-K. Briem, C. Reiff, F. Wulle, Personalization in the automotive and building sector – Research program of the high-performance center “mass personalization” in Stuttgart, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mass Customization and Personalization – Community of Europe (MCP-CE 2018), Novi Sad, Serbia, 2018 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.